On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 08:53:04AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 20/10/13 23:42, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 03:29:06PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > >> Setting EXTRA_CFLAGS=-m32 did not work because CFLAGS > >> was not passed around. > > > > this breaks feature detection for me on x86_64, > > I've got following errors misdetection with this patch: > > > > ... libperl: [ OFF ]
how about this one? > > ... on-exit: [ OFF ] > > > > and the build fails as well: > > > > CC builtin-stat.o > > builtin-record.c:42:12: error: static declaration of ‘on_exit’ follows > > non-static declaration > > In file included from util/util.h:51:0, > > from builtin.h:4, > > from builtin-record.c:8: > > /usr/include/stdlib.h:536:12: note: previous declaration of ‘on_exit’ was > > here > > make[1]: *** [builtin-record.o] Error 1 > > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > That is fixed in patch 11: perf tools: Fix test_on_exit for 32-bit build hum, could we apply those patches in reverse order? I think the notion is not to break build deliberatelly for the bisection sake. jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
