> The change in the max3110 driver makes the IRQ handling threaded, now > the handler is called only once per received character. Without that > change, we had many (more than 100) interrupts per one received > character. > > Unfortunately, SFI interface does not support IRQ polarity and > triggering modes, so we have to keep the hacks as hard-coded device > names and IRQ numbers until we switch to ACPI. > > Edge-triggered IRQ still supported to keep old platforms working. > Use platform data to pass the irq mode argument. > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Gorinov <ivan.gori...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Li Ning <ning...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: David Cohen <david.a.co...@linux.intel.com> ... > +++ b/include/linux/serial_max3110.h > @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ > +#ifndef _LINUX_SERIAL_MAX3110_H > +#define _LINUX_SERIAL_MAX3110_H > + > +/** > + * struct plat_max3110 - MAX3110 SPI UART platform data > + * @irq_edge_trigger: if IRQ is edge triggered > + * > + * You should use this structure in your machine description to specify > + * how the MAX3110 is connected. > + * > + */ > +struct plat_max3110 { > + int irq_edge_triggered; > +}; > + > +#endif > --
Is just resource->flags for IRQ can be reused for handle such case? --- N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z��w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a��� 0��h���i