On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
>>
>> Careful! There is one magic piece of state that you need to
>> save-and-restore if you do this, namely %cr2. Taking a page fault
>> always writes to %cr2, and we must *not* corrupt it in the NMI
>> handler.
>
> It looks like this is already dealt with (a similar thing is done for
> i386).
Oh, ok then, we should be good to go. I wonder why we needed that
special "_nmi()" version, then..
Please do check that NMI increment the irq-counts etc.. Otherwise
you'll need to add the explicit "pagefault_disable/enable()" pair
around the __copy_from_user_inatomic()..
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
