On Tuesday 03 of September 2013, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Sunday 18 of August 2013, Margarita Manterola wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz> wrote: > > >> diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c > > >> index 4bf0fc0..2ba7f4e 100644 > > >> --- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c > > >> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c > > >> @@ -149,7 +149,8 @@ static int set_room(struct tty_struct *tty) > > >> > > >> * characters will be beeped. > > >> */ > > >> > > >> if (left <= 0) > > >> > > >> - left = ldata->icanon && !ldata->canon_data; > > >> + if (waitqueue_active(&tty->read_wait)) > > >> + left = ldata->icanon && !ldata->canon_data; > > >> > > >> old_left = tty->receive_room; > > >> tty->receive_room = left; > > > > > > Was this applied? You may want to cc rjw... it is a regression, it is > > > not pretty, and it is something I blieve I hit but thought it was some > > > kind of "X weirdness". > > > > There were no replies to the previous mail asking for comments, and as > > far as I can see this has not been applied. I don't know who rjw is, > > could you be a bit more explicit, please? >
Hi Was just going over bug-readline and lkml archives and found no continuation of this. There was a patch proposed but didn't get applied. https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/17/31 Maybe it only needs proper patch submission? Looking from bug-readline archives debugging it took huge amount of work and would be sad that all that ended up being wasted. Whole thread if someone lost it https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/25/205 -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / maven.pl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
