On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:17:51PM +0100, Sandeepa Prabhu wrote: > Add info prints in sample kprobe handlers for ARM and ARM64 > architecture. > > Signed-off-by: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.pra...@linaro.org> > --- > samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c > b/samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c > index 366db1a..0521246 100644 > --- a/samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c > +++ b/samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c > @@ -42,6 +42,14 @@ static int handler_pre(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs > *regs) > " ex1 = 0x%lx\n", > p->addr, regs->pc, regs->ex1); > #endif > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM > + printk(KERN_INFO "pre_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, pc = 0x%lx\n", > + p->addr, regs->ARM_pc); > +#endif > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64 > + printk(KERN_INFO "pre_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, pc = 0x%lx\n", > + p->addr, (long)regs->pc); > +#endif
Huh? Why can't you combine these two together and either unconditionall cast to long, or use void * and %p? Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
