During remount of a bind mount (mount -o remount,bind,ro,... /mnt/mntpt),
we currently take down_write(&sb->s_umount). This causes the remount
operation to get blocked behind writes occuring on device (possibly
mounted somewhere else). We have observed that simply trying to change
the bind-mount from read-write to read-only can take several seconds
becuase writeback is in progress (which takes read-lock on sb->s_umount).
Since we are not modifying the superblock during MS_BIND remount, it
should be enough to take a read-lock on sb->s_umount instead of the
write-lock to protect against parallel unmounts and (in conjunction with
vfsmount_lock) parallel remounts.
This patch fixes the locking so that the MS_BIND remount changes happen
only under down_read(&sb->s_umount).

Changes from RFC:
  Instead of completely removing the locking in MS_BIND case, take
  read-lock on sb->s_umount to protect against parallel unmount.

Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <[email protected]>
---
 fs/namespace.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index da5c494..cf74920 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -454,11 +454,13 @@ void mnt_drop_write_file(struct file *file)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(mnt_drop_write_file);
 
+/*
+ * Must be called under br_write_lock(&vfsmount_lock).
+ */
 static int mnt_make_readonly(struct mount *mnt)
 {
        int ret = 0;
 
-       br_write_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
        mnt->mnt.mnt_flags |= MNT_WRITE_HOLD;
        /*
         * After storing MNT_WRITE_HOLD, we'll read the counters. This store
@@ -492,15 +494,15 @@ static int mnt_make_readonly(struct mount *mnt)
         */
        smp_wmb();
        mnt->mnt.mnt_flags &= ~MNT_WRITE_HOLD;
-       br_write_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
        return ret;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Must be called under br_write_lock(&vfsmount_lock).
+ */
 static void __mnt_unmake_readonly(struct mount *mnt)
 {
-       br_write_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
        mnt->mnt.mnt_flags &= ~MNT_READONLY;
-       br_write_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
 }
 
 int sb_prepare_remount_readonly(struct super_block *sb)
@@ -1796,6 +1798,9 @@ out:
        return err;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Must be called under br_write_lock(&vfsmount_lock).
+ */
 static int change_mount_flags(struct vfsmount *mnt, int ms_flags)
 {
        int error = 0;
@@ -1838,20 +1843,29 @@ static int do_remount(struct path *path, int flags, int 
mnt_flags,
        if (err)
                return err;
 
-       down_write(&sb->s_umount);
-       if (flags & MS_BIND)
+       if (flags & MS_BIND) {
+               down_read(&sb->s_umount);
+               br_write_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
                err = change_mount_flags(path->mnt, flags);
-       else if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+               if (!err) {
+                       mnt_flags |= mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_PROPAGATION_MASK;
+                       mnt->mnt.mnt_flags = mnt_flags;
+               }
+               br_write_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
+               up_read(&sb->s_umount);
+       } else if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
                err = -EPERM;
-       else
+       else {
+               down_write(&sb->s_umount);
                err = do_remount_sb(sb, flags, data, 0);
-       if (!err) {
-               br_write_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
-               mnt_flags |= mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_PROPAGATION_MASK;
-               mnt->mnt.mnt_flags = mnt_flags;
-               br_write_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
+               if (!err) {
+                       br_write_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
+                       mnt_flags |= mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_PROPAGATION_MASK;
+                       mnt->mnt.mnt_flags = mnt_flags;
+                       br_write_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
+               }
+               up_write(&sb->s_umount);
        }
-       up_write(&sb->s_umount);
        if (!err) {
                br_write_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
                touch_mnt_namespace(mnt->mnt_ns);
-- 
1.8.4.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to