On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:22:55 -0400 Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org> wrote:
> We probably want to cc stable for this and the next one. How should > these be routed? I can take these through percpu tree or mm works > too. Either way, it'd be best to route them together. Yes, all three look like -stable material to me. I'll grab them later in the week if you haven't ;) The names of the first two patches distress me. They rather clearly assert that the code affects percpu_counter.[ch], but that is not the case. Massaging is needed to fix that up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
