On 10/28/2013 09:53 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 10/23/2013 07:46 AM, Chen Gang wrote: >> first_lines_of_secondary() is a '__init' function, but it may be called >> by __cpu_up() by _cpu_up() by cpu_up() which is a normal export symbol >> function. So recommend to remove '__init'. >> >> The related warning (with allmodconfig): >> >> MODPOST vmlinux.o >> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x315c): Section mismatch in reference from the >> function __cpu_up() to the function .init.text:first_lines_of_secondary() >> The function __cpu_up() references >> the function __init first_lines_of_secondary(). >> This is often because __cpu_up lacks a __init >> annotation or the annotation of first_lines_of_secondary is wrong. >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <[email protected]> > > Applied for 3.13. But I'm planning to squash all the __init section annotation > fixes into one patch. OK with you ? >
It is OK to me. They are all related with each other, although toolchain reports several warnings (originally, I made them based on warning items). Thanks. -- Chen Gang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
