On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:48:43PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:01:11PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > Em Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:05:30PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu: > > > > > > Also it differentiate between pre-exec and post-fork events, which looks > > > more precise (and it fixes some comm mangling as well): > > > > > > > > > Before: > > > > > > # Overhead Command > > > # ........ ............... > > > # > > > 100.00% sched-me > > > > I noticed the above, just on the --stdio tho, checking why this is so... > > Can you try without --stdio, even using --tui? > > Thanks for this report, if you try my perf/urgent now it should be > fixed, was a problem fixed by Jiri Olsa that I thought affected only > perf/core. > > I cherry picked it and it fixed the problem for me, can you check that?
Yep, I checked your perf/urgent queue 8e50d384cc1d5afd2989cf0f7093756ed7164eb2 and it's fixed there, although I can't find the particular patch fixing this, but it works :) Thanks. > > - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/