Ming Lei <tom.leim...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: >> Russell King - ARM Linux <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> writes: >> >> Kallsyms tends to fall between modules and scripts. I assume it's not >> urgent, so no cc:stable on this one. > > Rusty, thanks a lot. > > BTW, there is already other report on the problem: > > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1310.3/02772.html
OK, *that* references the commit which is the problem, when went into v3.11 (b9b32bf70f2fb710b07c94e13afbc729afe221da) Unfortunately, *that commit* was cc:stable, so this needs to be cc:stable as well, not just >= 3.11. Looking back on those patches, there's a mass of cc:stable on them. The descriptions are either misleading, or these patches prevent theoretical attacks which means they shouldn't have been cc:stable. Grr... Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
