3.11-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Weijie Yang <[email protected]>

commit aa9bca05a467c61dcea4142b2877d5392de5bdce upstream.

zswap_tree is not freed when swapoff, and it got re-kmalloced in swapon,
so a memory leak occurs.

Free the memory of zswap_tree in zswap_frontswap_invalidate_area().

Signed-off-by: Weijie Yang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Bob Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
From: Weijie Yang <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 3.11 55/66] mm/zswap: bugfix: memory leak when invalidate and 
reclaim occur concurrently
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

Consider the following scenario:
thread 0: reclaim entry x (get refcount, but not call zswap_get_swap_cache_page)
thread 1: call zswap_frontswap_invalidate_page to invalidate entry x.
        finished, entry x and its zbud is not freed as its refcount != 0
        now, the swap_map[x] = 0
thread 0: now call zswap_get_swap_cache_page
        swapcache_prepare return -ENOENT because entry x is not used any more
        zswap_get_swap_cache_page return ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_NOMEM
        zswap_writeback_entry do nothing except put refcount
Now, the memory of zswap_entry x and its zpage leak.

Modify:
 - check the refcount in fail path, free memory if it is not referenced.

 - use ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_FAIL instead of ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_NOMEM as the fail path
   can be not only caused by nomem but also by invalidate.

[[email protected]: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Weijie Yang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Bob Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Seth Jennings <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

---
 mm/zswap.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/mm/zswap.c
+++ b/mm/zswap.c
@@ -816,6 +816,10 @@ static void zswap_frontswap_invalidate_a
        }
        tree->rbroot = RB_ROOT;
        spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+
+       zbud_destroy_pool(tree->pool);
+       kfree(tree);
+       zswap_trees[type] = NULL;
 }
 
 static struct zbud_ops zswap_zbud_ops = {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to