From: Bob Peterson <rpete...@redhat.com>
When we used try locks for rgrps on block allocations, it was important
to clear the flags field so that we used a blocking hold on the glock.
Now that we're not doing try locks, clearing flags is unnecessary, and
a waste of time. In fact, it's probably doing the wrong thing because
it clears the GL_SKIP bit that was set for the lvb tracking purposes.
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpete...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhit...@redhat.com>
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
index 7d64a27..8e50038 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
@@ -1825,7 +1825,6 @@ int gfs2_inplace_reserve(struct gfs2_inode *ip, u32
requested, u32 aflags)
return -EINVAL;
if (gfs2_rs_active(rs)) {
begin = rs->rs_rbm.rgd;
- flags = 0; /* Yoda: Do or do not. There is no try */
} else if (ip->i_rgd && rgrp_contains_block(ip->i_rgd, ip->i_goal)) {
rs->rs_rbm.rgd = begin = ip->i_rgd;
} else {
--
1.7.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
