On 2013/11/5 14:25, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com> wrote: > >> On 11/04/2013 12:11 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> >>> * H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com> wrote: >>> >>>> 8192 maybe? >>> >>> Yeah, that makes more sense I guess. >>> >> >> However, I still have serious issues with crap like this because >> randconfig is basically broken. If nothing else we need to get that >> feedback to the kconfig maintainers. > > The problem with that is that there are no kconfig maintainers: >
Yes, there is. https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/30/124 Though I don't know if the new maintainer will help in this issue. > KCONFIG > ... > S: Odd Fixes > > The kconfig code is still a hard to maintain, scarcely documented mess. It > took us almost a decade to rescue the NTP code from a similar obfuscation > trap and make it maintainable. It had the same author as the original > Kconfig code - and the Kconfig code is 10 times larger than the NTP code. > > Thanks, > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
