* Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:26:38PM -0800, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> > > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/Makefile
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/Makefile
> > > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/Makefile
> > > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ obj-y = fork.o exec_domain.o panic.o
> > > sysctl.o sysctl_binary.o capability.o ptrace.o timer.o user.o
> > > \
> > > signal.o sys.o kmod.o workqueue.o pid.o task_work.o \
> > > extable.o params.o posix-timers.o \
> > > - kthread.o sys_ni.o posix-cpu-timers.o mutex.o \
> > > + kthread.o sys_ni.o posix-cpu-timers.o \
> > > hrtimer.o rwsem.o nsproxy.o semaphore.o \
> > > notifier.o ksysfs.o cred.o reboot.o \
> > > async.o range.o groups.o lglock.o smpboot.o
> >
> > This is probably a stupid question, but I haven't been able to find
> > one kernel version that this applies cleanly over ???
>
> Oh my bad, it appears I made it against a working tree, not an actual
> published tree. That said, I don't think the rejects should be super
> hard to fix.
>
> If people don't object to the idea I'll respin against something
> published and testable.
Please do it against the locking tree (tip:core/locking), it has pending
changes plus v3.12 as well.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
