* Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 02:31:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > PeterZ,
> >
> > Can I have your Acked-by for this one? I guess now the goal is
> > achieved, no?
>
> So this option allows -t/-p/-u to create one buffer per cpu and attach
> all the various thread/process/user tasks' their counters to that one
> buffer?
>
> As opposed to the current state where each such counter would have its
> own buffer.
>
> If this is what the patch does, then yes, although I would prefer a
> slightly clearer Changelog.
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Is there any reason why we wouldn't want to make this the default
behavior?
That way we could also lose the somewhat suboptimal 'force' naming:
there's nothing forced really, we simply switch to another ring-buffer
setup ...
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
