On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <h...@hmh.eng.br> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Jingoo Han wrote: >> On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 8:57 AM, Kyungmin Park wrote: >> > From: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.p...@samsung.com> >> > >> > The most mobile phones have Ambient Light Sensors and it changes >> > brightness according lux. >> > It means it changes backlight brightness frequently by just writing sysfs >> > node, so it generates uevent. >> > >> > Usually there's no user to use this backlight changes. But it forks udev >> > worker threads and it takes >> > about 5ms. The main problem is that it hurts other process activities. so >> > remove it. >> > >> > Kay said >> > "Uevents are for the major, low-frequent, global device state-changes, >> > not for carrying-out any sort of measurement data. Subsystems which >> > need that should use other facilities like poll()-able sysfs file or >> > any other subscription-based, client-tracking interface which does not >> > cause overhead if it isn't used. Uevents are not the right thing to >> > use here, and upstream udev should not paper-over broken kernel >> > subsystems." > > True. > > Now, let's take a look at reality: should you poll()/select() on a sysfs > node that doesn't suport it, it will wait until the poll/select timeout > happens (or EINTR happens), and userspace has absolutely NO way to detect > whether a sysfs node has poll/select support. > > What happens if the sysfs interface did not provide poll/select support > since day one, but rather added it later? Nobody will use it for a *long* > time, if ever... unless you actually took pains to version the sysfs > interface, and people actually care.
If that's an issue, we can add a new "event" file, just for that. >> 'thinkpad_acpi.c' uses the 'BACKLIGHT_UPDATE_SYSFS'. >> Henrique, can we remove it? > > Can't you fix this by rate-limiting, or otherwise adding an attribute that > backlight devices should set when they need to supress change events? Yeah, great idea, fix a bad hack with another bad one on top. :) Passing measurement data through uevents is just an utterly broken idea which cannot be fixed. > Is there a proper on-screen-display support path for the backlight class > nowadays? Otherwise, you'd be removing the only way userspace ever had to > do proper OSD of backlight changes... OSD drawing and event sounds usually happen as a fedback for keypresses of brightness control, it would be weird to show up when something else, like a light-sensor, adjusts the brightness in the background. Anyway, there might be the need for coordination and a new interface, but uevents for measurement data need to die entirely; they make no sense, never made any; and the sooner they are gone the better. Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
