On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:59:14 +0000, Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Nov 2013, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Sat, 2 Nov 2013, Grant Likely wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:05:22 -0500, Rob Herring <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > From: Rob Herring <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > Platform devices created by DT code don't initialize dma_mask pointer to > > > > anything. Set it to coherent_dma_mask by default if the architecture > > > > code has not set it. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]> > > > > > > I believe this is okay. I haven't done any testing to back up that > > > opinion though. > > > > Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]> > > BTW I hope you are planning on sending this upstream soon, because > without it I can very easily corrupt my root fs by simply booting the system.
Gah! That's pretty nasty. It is in Rob's for-next branch, but it hasn't been marked for backporting to stable. Best thing to do here is for either you or Rob to repost the patch to [email protected] and include the commit id from Rob's tree. It's not upstream yet, but it will be soon. How far back in kernel releases do you want the patch backported to? g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
