(apologies if this is a dup -- my mail client crashed and I don't see
this one in the lkml archives)
--
Older kernels on 64-bit machines would incorrectly encode pre-1970
ext4 dates as post-2311 dates.  Detect and correct this (assuming the
current date is before 2242).

Signed-off-by: David Turner <nova...@novalis.org>
---
 e2fsck/pass1.c   | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 e2fsck/problem.c |  4 ++++
 e2fsck/problem.h |  4 ++++
 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+)

diff --git a/e2fsck/pass1.c b/e2fsck/pass1.c
index ab23e42..b5ae885 100644
--- a/e2fsck/pass1.c
+++ b/e2fsck/pass1.c
@@ -348,6 +348,24 @@ fix:
                                EXT2_INODE_SIZE(sb), "pass1");
 }
 
+#define EXT4_EPOCH_BITS 2
+#define EXT4_EPOCH_MASK ((1 << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS) - 1)
+
+static int check_inode_extra_negative_epoch(__u32 xtime, __u32 extra) {
+       return (xtime & (1 << 31)) != 0 &&
+               (extra & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK) == EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
+}
+
+#define CHECK_INODE_EXTRA_NEGATIVE_EPOCH(inode, xtime) \
+       check_inode_extra_negative_epoch(inode->i_##xtime, \
+                                        inode->i_##xtime##_extra)
+
+/* When today's date is earlier than 2242, we assume that atimes,
+ * ctimes, and mtimes greater than 2242 are actually pre-1970 dates
+ * mis-encoded.
+ */
+#define EXT4_EXTRA_NEGATIVE_DATE_CUTOFF 5 * (1ULL << 32)
+
 static void check_inode_extra_space(e2fsck_t ctx, struct problem_context *pctx)
 {
        struct ext2_super_block *sb = ctx->fs->super;
@@ -388,6 +406,26 @@ static void check_inode_extra_space(e2fsck_t ctx, struct 
problem_context *pctx)
                /* it seems inode has an extended attribute(s) in body */
                check_ea_in_inode(ctx, pctx);
        }
+
+       /*
+        * If the inode's extended atime (ctime, mtime) is stored in
+        * the old, invalid format, the inode is corrupt.
+        */
+       if (sizeof(time_t) > 4 && ctx->now < EXT4_EXTRA_NEGATIVE_DATE_CUTOFF &&
+           CHECK_INODE_EXTRA_NEGATIVE_EPOCH(inode, atime) ||
+           CHECK_INODE_EXTRA_NEGATIVE_EPOCH(inode, ctime) ||
+           CHECK_INODE_EXTRA_NEGATIVE_EPOCH(inode, mtime)) {
+
+               if (!fix_problem(ctx, PR_1_EA_TIME_OUT_OF_RANGE, pctx))
+                       return;
+
+               inode->i_atime_extra &= ~EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
+               inode->i_ctime_extra &= ~EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
+               inode->i_mtime_extra &= ~EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
+               e2fsck_write_inode_full(ctx, pctx->ino, pctx->inode,
+                                       EXT2_INODE_SIZE(sb), "pass1");
+       }
+
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.c b/e2fsck/problem.c
index 897693a..b212d00 100644
--- a/e2fsck/problem.c
+++ b/e2fsck/problem.c
@@ -1018,6 +1018,10 @@ static struct e2fsck_problem problem_table[] = {
          N_("@i %i, end of extent exceeds allowed value\n\t(logical @b %c, 
physical @b %b, len %N)\n"),
          PROMPT_CLEAR, 0 },
 
+  /* Timestamp(s) on inode beyond 2310-04-04 are likely pre-1970 dates. */
+       { PR_1_EA_TIME_OUT_OF_RANGE,
+               N_("Timestamp(s) on @i %i beyond 2310-04-04 are likely pre-1970 
dates.\n"),
+               PROMPT_FIX | PR_PREEN_OK | PR_NO_OK, 0 },
 
        /* Pass 1b errors */
 
diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.h b/e2fsck/problem.h
index ae1ed26..3710638 100644
--- a/e2fsck/problem.h
+++ b/e2fsck/problem.h
@@ -593,6 +593,10 @@ struct problem_context {
 #define PR_1_EXTENT_INDEX_START_INVALID        0x01006D
 
 #define PR_1_EXTENT_END_OUT_OF_BOUNDS  0x01006E
+
+/* Timestamp(s) on inode beyond 2310-04-04 are likely pre-1970 dates. */
+#define PR_1_EA_TIME_OUT_OF_RANGE      0x01006F
+
 /*
  * Pass 1b errors
  */
-- 
1.8.1.2




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to