On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 13:23 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 08:40:57AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> > +static inline int max14577_reg_set_safeout(struct regmap *rmap, int on)
> > +{
> > + u8 reg_data = (on ? 0x1 << CTRL2_SFOUTORD_SHIFT : 0x0);
>
> The ternery operator is rarely helpful for legibility.
>
> > + case MAX14577_SAFEOUT:
> > + max14577_read_reg(rmap, MAX14577_REG_CONTROL2, ®_data);
> > + return (reg_data & CTRL2_SFOUTORD_MASK) != 0;
>
> regulator_is_enabled_regmap() and the other helpers should be used for
> this regulator.
>
> > +static int max14577_reg_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> > +{
> > + int rid = rdev_get_id(rdev);
> > +
> > + switch (rid) {
> > + case MAX14577_CHARGER:
> > + return max14577_reg_set_charging(rdev->regmap, 0);
> > + case MAX14577_SAFEOUT:
> > + return max14577_reg_set_safeout(rdev->regmap, 0);
> > + default:
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +}
>
> This sort of indirection isn't adding anything, just make the ops
> directly callable (and in the case of SAFEOUT use the helpers).
>
> > +static int max14577_reg_get_current_limit(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> > +{
> > + if (rdev_get_id(rdev) != MAX14577_CHARGER)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + return max14577_reg_calc_charge_current(rdev->regmap);
>
> Just inline the function, it's only called once.
>
> > + if (rdev_get_id(rdev) != MAX14577_CHARGER)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + dev_info(max14577->dev, "Requested current <%d, %d>\n", min_uA, max_uA);
>
> Don't spam the logs like this, there's problems like this throughout the
> rest of the code.
>
> > +static int max14577_regulator_dt_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > + struct max14577_platform_data *pdata)
>
> No DT binding document.
>
> > +static int max14577_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct max14577_regulator *max14577_reg;
> > + struct max14577 *max14577 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> > + struct max14577_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(max14577->dev);
> > + int i, ret, size;
> > + struct regulator_config config = {};
> > +
> > + if (!pdata) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No platform data found.\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (max14577->dev->of_node) {
> > + ret = max14577_regulator_dt_parse_pdata(pdev, pdata);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
>
> The driver insists on platform data but then requires DT...
>
> > + size = sizeof(struct regulator_dev *) * pdata->num_regulators;
> > + max14577_reg->regulators = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> You shouldn't be getting the number of regulators from platform data,
> the number of regulators physically present in the silicon isn't going
> to vary.
>
> > + max14577_reg->regulators[i] =
> > + regulator_register(&supported_regulators[id], &config);
>
> devm_regulator_register().
Thanks for review. I'll start working on issues.
> > +subsys_initcall(max14577_regulator_init);
>
> Why is this subsys_initcall()?
Just like other regulators it should start before any other devices, for
example USB drivers.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
