On 11/15/2013 07:50 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Gao feng <gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com> writes:
>
>> Privileged user should have rights to mount/umount/move
>> these even locked mount.
>
> Hmm. This is pretty much a can't happen case, as the only exist in mount
> namespaces where the global root isn't the root. How are you getting
> into this situation? Using setns() ?
>
Before, priviged user can use setns to set his mount namespace to the
container's mount namespace, and change container's mount directly.
this patch just gives back host the control of container.
> Why would we even care?
>
> As implemented this patch does not handle nested user namespaces and
> that really worries me at a semantic level.
>
> We don't want to design cases where we can create containers in
> containers.
>
> Eric
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> fs/namespace.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
>> index da5c494..7097fc7 100644
>> --- a/fs/namespace.c
>> +++ b/fs/namespace.c
>> @@ -1297,6 +1297,11 @@ static inline bool may_mount(void)
>> return ns_capable(current->nsproxy->mnt_ns->user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
>> }
>>
>> +static inline bool may_mount_lock(struct mount *mnt)
>> +{
>> + return !(mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_LOCKED) || capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Now umount can handle mount points as well as block devices.
>> * This is important for filesystems which use unnamed block devices.
>> @@ -1330,7 +1335,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(umount, char __user *, name, int,
>> flags)
>> goto dput_and_out;
>> if (!check_mnt(mnt))
>> goto dput_and_out;
>> - if (mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_LOCKED)
>> + if (!may_mount_lock(mnt))
>> goto dput_and_out;
>>
>> retval = do_umount(mnt, flags);
>> @@ -1768,7 +1773,8 @@ static int do_loopback(struct path *path, const char
>> *old_name,
>> if (!check_mnt(parent) || !check_mnt(old))
>> goto out2;
>>
>> - if (!recurse && has_locked_children(old, old_path.dentry))
>> + if (!recurse && has_locked_children(old, old_path.dentry) &&
>> + !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>> goto out2;
>>
>> if (recurse)
>> @@ -1895,7 +1901,7 @@ static int do_move_mount(struct path *path, const char
>> *old_name)
>> if (!check_mnt(p) || !check_mnt(old))
>> goto out1;
>>
>> - if (old->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_LOCKED)
>> + if (!may_mount_lock(old))
>> goto out1;
>>
>> err = -EINVAL;
>> @@ -2679,7 +2685,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(pivot_root, const char __user *,
>> new_root,
>> goto out4;
>> if (!check_mnt(root_mnt) || !check_mnt(new_mnt))
>> goto out4;
>> - if (new_mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_LOCKED)
>> + if (!may_mount_lock(new_mnt))
>> goto out4;
>> error = -ENOENT;
>> if (d_unlinked(new.dentry))
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
