On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:34:05AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > That brings up an interesting question: what is better for users, if > we schedule as many as we can and say 'not supported' to the rest > (current behavior), or if we fail the whole group? > > I'd say that the default behavior should be what Jiri implemented: get > the most out of the situation and inform. But you are right in that > 'forcing' all elements of a group to be valid should be possible as > well - if a special perf stat option or event format is used.
So I don't agree, but if you want to keep this IMO weird behaviour at least WARN about it in big blinking neon letters that the user isn't getting what he asked for. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
