Frequency lock should be considered in suspend/hibernation.
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <[email protected]>
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index f3c2287..cd05b0a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block
*notifier,
int ret;
switch (pm_event) {
+ case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
frequency_locked = true;
@@ -198,6 +199,8 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block
*notifier,
break;
+ case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
+ case PM_POST_RESTORE:
case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
frequency_locked = false;
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
