On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:14 PM, boris brezillon
<b.brezil...@overkiz.com> wrote:
> On 20/11/2013 15:59, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> On 13:06 Wed 28 Aug , Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>>> mmc0_slot0_switch-0 {
>>> + atmel,pins =
>>> + <AT91_PIOB 22
>>> AT91_PERIPH_GPIO (AT91_PINCTRL_OUTPUT | AT91_PINCTRL_OUTPUT_VAL(1))>;
>>> + };
>>
>> nack this is a regulator the pinctrl API is not done for gpio default
>> value
>
> I know this can be represented as a regulator, but looking at the datasheet,
> this looks more like a switch than a regulator.
No matter whether it's a switch or a GPIO regulator it seems we
are in violent agreement that it should not be controlled by the
pin control states at least.
Start with making it a GPIO then you can figure out whether
a GPIO regulator or drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c should be
used.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
