Hello Roman, Roman Zippel wrote: > An additional comment about the order of events. What you're doing in > lockless_reserve is bogus anyway. There is no single correct time to > write into the event. By artificially synchronizing event order and event > time you only cheat yourself. You either take it into account during > postprocessing that events can be interrupted or the time stamp doesn't > seem to be that important, but there is nothing you can do during the > recording of the event except of completely disabling interrupts.
Correct and like I said before, we are dropping the lockless scheme. Ergo, disabling interrupts we will. Karim -- Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits http://www.opersys.com || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || 1-866-677-4546 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
