On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Now that all users of acpi_gpio.h have been moved to user either the GPIO
s/user/use
> descriptor interface or to the internal gpiolib.h we can get rid of
gpiolib.h will also need to be renamed if you follow my suggestion below.
> acpi_gpio.h entirely.
>
> Once this is done the only interface to get GPIOs to drivers enumerated
> from ACPI namespace is the descriptor based interface.
Oh, do I like this. :)
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 4 +++-
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 1 -
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/acpi_gpio.h | 45
> ---------------------------------------------
> 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 include/linux/acpi_gpio.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> index cb2da66fbbfe..6c158d9a6efa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> @@ -12,11 +12,13 @@
>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> -#include <linux/acpi_gpio.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>
> +#include "gpiolib.h"
> +
> struct acpi_gpio_evt_pin {
> struct list_head node;
> acpi_handle *evt_handle;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index 70abccf0d144..a6b82413c290 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> #include <linux/gpio.h>
> #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> -#include <linux/acpi_gpio.h>
> #include <linux/idr.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
> index 2ed23ab8298c..82be586c1f90 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
> @@ -12,12 +12,35 @@
> #ifndef GPIOLIB_H
> #define GPIOLIB_H
>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +
> +/**
> + * struct acpi_gpio_info - ACPI GPIO specific information
> + * @gpioint: if %true this GPIO is of type GpioInt otherwise type is GpioIo
> + * @active_low: in case of @gpioint, the pin is active low
> + */
> +struct acpi_gpio_info {
> + bool gpioint;
> + bool active_low;
> +};
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> void acpi_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip);
> void acpi_gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip);
> +
> +struct gpio_desc *acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(struct device *dev, int index,
> + struct acpi_gpio_info *info);
> #else
> static inline void acpi_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip) { }
> static inline void acpi_gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip) { }
> +
> +static inline struct gpio_desc *
> +acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(struct device *dev, int index,
> + struct acpi_gpio_info *info)
> +{
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS);
> +}
> #endif
Since this header contains purely ACPI-related declarations so far, I wonder
if it should not be renamed acpi.h?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
