On mar, 2013-11-19 at 14:56 +0000, David Vrabel wrote: > The relevant bits in dummy_numa_init are in the error path of > xen_numa_init(). > > I do think this approach (using the provided API to setup the single > (dummy) node), is preferable to calling dummy_numa_init(). > > If I thought the hypervisor ABI was finalized, I'd be happy with this > series as-is -- the remaining issues are superficial. > So, David, in this regard, what do you think about these (and the following messages in the thread?
http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/mid/%3c528b7d350200007800104...@nat28.tlf.novell.com%3E http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/mid/%3C1384871712.19880.90.camel@Abyss%3E http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/mid/%3c528b88570200007800104...@nat28.tlf.novell.com%3E http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/mid/%3C1384875772.15360.6.camel@Solace%3E http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/mid/%3c528b97c50200007800104...@nat28.tlf.novell.com%3E I think Jan has a point about how we are right now retrieving and treating the number of vnodes... Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
