Hi Steve,

On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 03:27:08 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 23:22:52 +0900
> Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> 2013-11-21 (목), 12:01 +0100, Jiri Olsa:
>> > Adding traceevent_host_bigendian function to get host
>> > endianity. It's used in following patches.
>> 
>> [SNIP]
>> > +static inline int traceevent_host_bigendian(void)
>> > +{
>> > +  unsigned char str[] = { 0x1, 0x2, 0x3, 0x4 };
>> > +  unsigned int *ptr;
>> > +
>> > +  ptr = (unsigned int *)str;
>> > +  return *ptr == 0x01020304;
>> 
>> Is it safe for every architecture supported - especially ones that
>> require stricter alignment?  I know many architectures/compilers align
>> stack but not sure doing this is safe for all architecture.
>
> Would you prefer this (I tested it on both a big and little endian)
>
> {
>       unsigned char str[] = { 0x1, 0x2, 0x3, 0x4 };
>       unsigned int val;
>
>       memcpy(&val, str, 4);
>       return val == 0x01020304;
> }

Yeah, looks good to me.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to