On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 03:12:19 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 23:17:06 +0900
> Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> > 
>> [SNIP[
>> > +static void
>> > +load_plugin(struct pevent *pevent, const char *path,
>> > +      const char *file, void *data)
>> > +{
>> > +  struct plugin_list **plugin_list = data;
>> > +  pevent_plugin_load_func func;
>> > +  struct plugin_list *list;
>> > +  const char *alias;
>> > +  char *plugin;
>> > +  void *handle;
>> > +
>> > +  plugin = malloc_or_die(strlen(path) + strlen(file) + 2);
>> 
>> I'd like not to see this malloc_or_die() anymore in a new code.  Just
>> returning after showing a warning looks enough here.
>
> Yeah I agree. This is a relic from my code. I think it's OK to add
> here, as it is pretty much direct port of my code, and then we can just
> add a patch against it to remove it.

Okay.  I agree that it'd be better to make them separate patches.

>
>> 
>> > +
>> > +  strcpy(plugin, path);
>> > +  strcat(plugin, "/");
>> > +  strcat(plugin, file);
>> > +
>> > +  handle = dlopen(plugin, RTLD_NOW | RTLD_GLOBAL);
>> 
>> Why RTLD_NOW and RTLD_GLOBAL?  Hmm.. maybe using _NOW is needed to
>> prevent a runtime error, but not sure why _GLOBAL is needed.
>
> Yes, we want to make sure all symbols defined are available at time of
> load, otherwise bail out.
>
>> 
>> IIUC _GLOBAL is for exporting symbols to *other libraries*.  Is it
>> intended for this plugin support?
>
> That was the plan. To have one plugin supply a set of functions that
> other plugins may use. That is what GLOBAL is for, right?  I don't
> recall if I every did this, but it was something I wanted for future
> work.
>
> Now if we don't need it, we could remove it, but is it bad to have?

I might be slow down symbol resolution of new plugins tiny bit.  But I
don't think it's a real problem as its effect will be negligible.

I don't object the code but just want to know your intention. :)

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to