3.2.53-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleik...@oracle.com>
commit 8660998608cfa1077e560034db81885af8e1e885 upstream.
If insert_inode_locked() fails, we shouldn't be calling
unlock_new_inode().
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleik...@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Michael L. Semon <mlsemo...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ struct inode *ialloc(struct inode *paren
if (insert_inode_locked(inode) < 0) {
rc = -EINVAL;
- goto fail_unlock;
+ goto fail_put;
}
inode_init_owner(inode, parent, mode);
@@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ struct inode *ialloc(struct inode *paren
fail_drop:
dquot_drop(inode);
inode->i_flags |= S_NOQUOTA;
-fail_unlock:
clear_nlink(inode);
unlock_new_inode(inode);
fail_put:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
