3.2.53-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Fan Du <fan...@windriver.com>
commit 74e3d1e17b2e11d175970b85acd44f5927000ba2 upstream.
Two rt tasks bind to one CPU core.
The higher priority rt task A preempts a lower priority rt task B which
has already taken the write seq lock, and then the higher priority rt
task A try to acquire read seq lock, it's doomed to lockup.
rt task A with lower priority: call write
i_size_write rt task B with higher
priority: call sync, and preempt task A
write_seqcount_begin(&inode->i_size_seqcount); i_size_read
inode->i_size = i_size; read_seqcount_begin <--
lockup here...
So disable preempt when acquiring every i_size_seqcount *write* lock will
cure the problem.
Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan...@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
include/linux/fs.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -911,9 +911,11 @@ static inline loff_t i_size_read(const s
static inline void i_size_write(struct inode *inode, loff_t i_size)
{
#if BITS_PER_LONG==32 && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
+ preempt_disable();
write_seqcount_begin(&inode->i_size_seqcount);
inode->i_size = i_size;
write_seqcount_end(&inode->i_size_seqcount);
+ preempt_enable();
#elif BITS_PER_LONG==32 && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT)
preempt_disable();
inode->i_size = i_size;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
