On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:50:23AM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Generalize the function so that we can accommodate all three comparison
> methods: delta, ratio, and wdiff.
> 
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artag...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-diff.c | 47 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
> index 84d5f2d..a54736c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
> @@ -769,33 +769,60 @@ static int hpp__entry_baseline(struct hist_entry *he, 
> char *buf, size_t size)
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int hpp__color_delta(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
> -                     struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he)
> +static int __hpp__color_compare(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
> +                             struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he,
> +                             int comparison_method)
>  {
>       struct diff_hpp_fmt *dfmt =
>               container_of(fmt, struct diff_hpp_fmt, fmt);
>       struct hist_entry *pair = get_pair_fmt(he, dfmt);
> -     double percent;
> +     double delta;
>       char pfmt[20] = " ";
>  
>       if (!pair)
>               goto dummy_print;
>       if (pair->diff.computed)
> -             percent = pair->diff.period_ratio_delta;
> +             switch (comparison_method) {
> +             case COMPUTE_DELTA:
> +                     delta = pair->diff.period_ratio_delta;
> +                     break;
> +             default:
> +                     BUG_ON(1);
> +             }
>       else
> -             percent = compute_delta(he, pair);
> +             switch (comparison_method) {
> +             case COMPUTE_DELTA:
> +                     delta = compute_delta(he, pair);
> +                     break;
> +             default:
> +                     BUG_ON(1);
> +             }
>  
> -     if (!he->dummy && fabs(percent) >= 0.01) {
> -             scnprintf(pfmt, 20, "%%%+d.2f%%%%", dfmt->header_width - 1);
> -             return color_snprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size,
> -                             percent > 0 ? PERF_COLOR_GREEN : PERF_COLOR_RED,
> -                             pfmt, percent);
> +     if (!he->dummy) {

isn't this check superfluous because of the above (!pair) check?

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to