Hi Alexey, On Tue, Nov 05 2013, Alexey Neyman wrote: > Ignore Card Interrupt bit in the interrupt status if we already know that > mmc_signal_sdio_irq() is going to be called at the end of sdhci_irq(). This > avoids a needless loop in sdhci_irq() repeatedly reading interrupt status > and doing nothing. > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Neyman <sti...@att.net> > Acked-by: Dong Aisheng <b29...@freescale.com> > --- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c > index 7a7fb4f..a83cd1b 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c > @@ -2491,6 +2491,14 @@ again: > result = IRQ_HANDLED; > > intmask = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_INT_STATUS); > + > + /* > + * If we know we'll call the driver to signal SDIO IRQ, disregard > + * further indications of Card Interrupt in the status to avoid a > + * needless loop. > + */ > + if (cardint) > + intmask &= ~SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT; > if (intmask && --max_loops) > goto again; > out:
Thanks, this was included in 3.13-rc1 via mmc-next. - Chris. -- Chris Ball <c...@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
