* Bill Rugolsky Jr. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:10:56PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> > +#define INIT_RLIMITS \
> > +{ \
> > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \
> > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \
> > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \
> > + { _STK_LIM, _STK_LIM_MAX }, \
> > + { 0, RLIM_INFINITY }, \
> > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \
> > + { 0, 0 }, \
> > + { INR_OPEN, INR_OPEN }, \
> > + { MLOCK_LIMIT, MLOCK_LIMIT }, \
> > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \
> > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \
> > + { MAX_SIGPENDING, MAX_SIGPENDING }, \
> > + { MQ_BYTES_MAX, MQ_BYTES_MAX }, \
> > +}
>
> While you are rooting around in there, perhaps this block
> should be converted to C99 initializer syntax, to avoid
> problems if arch-specific changes are later introduced?
Yes, I had considered the same. I had checked a couple arches and with
proper designated initializers, that bit would not need to be duplicated.
thanks,
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
