* Adrian Hunter <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 26/11/13 18:15, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Adrian Hunter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> >> The logic was not looking in the buildid cache for kcore
> >> if the host kernel buildid did not match the recorded
> >> kernel buildid.
> > 
> > It would be nice to also include the specific failure mode in the 
> > changelog: exactly how can users run into this. That will be more 
> > useful to most people reading these changelogs than a more abstract 
> > bug description.
> 
> The preconditions for the problem are that kcore is in the buildid
> cache and that the running kernel has a different buildid e.g.
> 
> $ perf buildid-list | grep kernel.kallsyms
> b18fbe769dea12513028a4287dae02efc1582c29 [kernel.kallsyms]
> 
> $ perf record -o /tmp/junk true >/dev/null 2>&1 ; perf buildid-list -i 
> /tmp/junk | grep kernel.kallsyms
> 504f9fd9328c40714995ce76fe1354c6e90136ce [kernel.kallsyms]
> 
> 
> 
> Before the patch:
> 
> 
> $ perf script -v >out.txt
> build id event received for [kernel.kallsyms]: 
> b18fbe769dea12513028a4287dae02efc1582c29
> <SNIP>
> Using 
> /home/ahunter/.debug/[kernel.kallsyms]/b18fbe769dea12513028a4287dae02efc1582c29
>  for symbols
> 
> perf script stopped
> 
> 
> After the patch:
> 
> 
> $ perf script -v >out.txt
> build id event received for [kernel.kallsyms]: 
> b18fbe769dea12513028a4287dae02efc1582c29
> <SNIP>
> Using 
> /home/ahunter/.debug/[kernel.kcore]/b18fbe769dea12513028a4287dae02efc1582c29/2013112617084061/kcore
>  for kernel object code
> Using 
> /home/ahunter/.debug/[kernel.kcore]/b18fbe769dea12513028a4287dae02efc1582c29/2013112617084061/kallsyms
>  for symbols
> 
> perf script stopped

So the result of the patch is that kernel symbols get 
resolved/annotated correctly, as expected from the live kcore feature, 
right?

Thanks,

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to