On 11/27, zhang.y...@zte.com.cn wrote:
>
> Userspace process doesn't want the PF_NO_SETAFFINITY, but its parent may be
> a kernel worker thread which has PF_NO_SETAFFINITY set, and this worker thread
> can do kernel_thread() to create the child.
> Clearing this flag in usersapce child to enable its migrating capability.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <zhang.y...@zte.com.cn>

Thanks!

Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>

> --- linux-3.12.old/fs/exec.c  2013-11-26 08:53:12.175811856 +0000
> +++ linux-3.12/fs/exec.c      2013-11-27 09:36:56.231972168 +0000
> @@ -1090,8 +1090,8 @@ int flush_old_exec(struct linux_binprm *
>       bprm->mm = NULL;                /* We're using it now */
> 
>       set_fs(USER_DS);
> -     current->flags &=
> -             ~(PF_RANDOMIZE | PF_FORKNOEXEC | PF_KTHREAD | PF_NOFREEZE);
> +     current->flags &= ~(PF_RANDOMIZE | PF_FORKNOEXEC | PF_KTHREAD |
> +                                     PF_NOFREEZE | PF_NO_SETAFFINITY);
>       flush_thread();
>       current->personality &= ~bprm->per_clear;
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to