On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 03:27:01PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That seems excessive and it probably ought to go in as a bug fix > > afterwards. Given that it's just an addition of data to the table I'd > > expect we could cope, we've routinely done that with similar updates in > > the past without incident. > Ah, is the depends patch in Mainline already? I assumed it was due to > go in during the v3.14 merge window? If it's already in Mainline, then > sure I don't mind if it goes in -fixes via ASoC, no problem. No, it's for v3.14 - it just seemed like for the size/impact of the change we should be able to handle the situation more smoothly.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
