On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:44:38PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > How about both enlarging the table _and_ aligning the buckets? As you > > know, increasing the size of the table also benefits (particularly in > > larger systems) in having more spinlocks. So we reduce the amount of > > collisions and alleviate contention on the hb->lock. Btw, do you have > > any particular concerns about the larger hash table patch? > > My only concern was the amount of #ifdef. > > Wouldn't something like the below also work?
Definitely. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
