On 11/20/13 at 12:50pm, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> index 4eabc16..fb41b73 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,13 @@
> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> #include <asm/debugreg.h>
>
> +/* arch dependent functionality related to kexec file based syscall */
> +static struct kexec_file_type kexec_file_type[]={
> + {"", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL},
> +};
> +
> +
> +void *arch_kexec_kernel_image_load(struct kimage *image, char *kernel,
> + unsigned long kernel_len, char *initrd,
> + unsigned long initrd_len, char *cmdline,
> + unsigned long cmdline_len)
> +{
> + int idx = image->file_handler_idx;
> +
> + if (idx < 0)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOEXEC);
> +
> + return kexec_file_type[idx].load(image, kernel, kernel_len, initrd,
> + initrd_len, cmdline, cmdline_len);
> +}
> +
> +int arch_image_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image)
> +{
Hi Vivek,
This function is defined as one of arch specific fucntion set, why don't
we name it in a unified prefix as others.
And name of the default dummy function in kernel/kexec.c is not consistent
with the arch specific one, so currently
arch_image_file_post_load_cleanup of x86 arch is not called. Please
consider wihch one need be changed.
> +
> +void __attribute__ ((weak))
> +arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image)
> +{
> + return;
> +}
> +
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
