> From: Of Roger Quadros
> With u-boot 2013.10, USB devices are sometimes not detected
> on OMAP4 Panda. To make us independent of what bootloader does
> with the USB Host module, we must RESET it to get it to a known
> good state. This patch Soft RESETs the USB Host module.
...
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
> @@ -43,14 +43,18 @@
>  /* UHH Register Set */
>  #define      OMAP_UHH_REVISION                               (0x00)
>  #define      OMAP_UHH_SYSCONFIG                              (0x10)
> -#define      OMAP_UHH_SYSCONFIG_MIDLEMODE                    (1 << 12)
> +#define      OMAP_UHH_SYSCONFIG_MIDLEMASK                    (3 << 12)
> +#define OMAP_UHH_SYSCONFIG_MIDLESHIFT                        (12)

(tab/space issue)

Wouldn't it be clearer to define these in the opposite order with:
+#define        OMAP_UHH_SYSCONFIG_MIDLEMASK                    (3 << 
OMAP_UHH_SYSCONFIG_MIDLESHIFT)

... 
> +static void omap_usbhs_rev1_reset(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +     struct usbhs_hcd_omap *omap = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +     u32 reg;
> +     unsigned long timeout;
> +
> +     reg = usbhs_read(omap->uhh_base, OMAP_UHH_SYSCONFIG);
> +
> +     /* Soft Reset */
> +     usbhs_write(omap->uhh_base, OMAP_UHH_SYSCONFIG,
> +                 reg | OMAP_UHH_SYSCONFIG_SOFTRESET);
> +
> +     timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100);
> +     while (!(usbhs_read(omap->uhh_base, OMAP_UHH_SYSSTATUS)
> +                     & OMAP_UHH_SYSSTATUS_RESETDONE)) {
> +             cpu_relax();
> +
> +             if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
> +                     dev_err(dev, "Soft RESET operation timed out\n");
> +                     break;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     /* Set No-Standby */
> +     reg &= ~OMAP_UHH_SYSCONFIG_MIDLEMASK;
> +     reg |= OMAP_UHH_SYSCONFIG_MIDLE_NOSTANDBY
> +             << OMAP_UHH_SYSCONFIG_MIDLESHIFT;
> +
> +     /* Set No-Idle */
> +     reg &= ~OMAP_UHH_SYSCONFIG_SIDLEMASK;
> +     reg |= OMAP_UHH_SYSCONFIG_SIDLE_NOIDLE
> +             << OMAP_UHH_SYSCONFIG_SIDLESHIFT;

Why not pass in the mask and value and avoid replicating the
entire function. I can't see any other significant differences,
the udelay(2) won't be significant.

I'm not sure of the context this code runs in, but if the reset
is likely to take a significant portion of the 100ms timeout
period, why not just sleep for a few ms between status polls.

        David




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to