On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 04:03:42PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Is this close enough of what you had in mind when asked me to look at this?
Yes, this is exactly the sort of thing I was looking for - thanks! > twl4030 codec is going to be a bit more complicated AFAIK but it will come > eventually. Yup, they're both more complicated than most of these devices otherwise I'd have thrown some changes out myself - all the fiddling around inside the cache data makes them more difficult to work with.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
