On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 14:10 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 14:56 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 10:32 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
[] > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/12/483 > > > > Hmm... Still not in kernel. Do you know reason why it so? > > It was just for discussion and I didn't sign or push it > to anyone else. > > What's slightly funny is how far back dma_addr_t printk > discussions go. > > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0202.1/1221.html Wow, 2002! Let's cross over a finish line in 2013. > Anyway, if you think you're going to do a lot of > transforms of printk("%x", dma_addr_t) with or without > (unsigned long long) or (u64) casts, I'll submit a signed > patch to Andrew. I think it worse to submit even if we have no more such casting in the future (which is the case I don't believe in). -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
