Quoting r. Chris Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Re: [PATCH 1/5] compat_ioctl call seems to miss a security hook": > * Michael S. Tsirkin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I'm all for it, but the way the patch below works, we could end up > > calling ->ioctl or ->unlocked_ioctl from the compat > > syscall, and we dont want that. > > Hmm, I didn't actually change how those are called. So if it's an issue, > then I don't think this patch introduces it. > > thanks, > -chris
Sorry, you are right, we go to do_ioctl only if there are no callbacks. Patch looks good to go to me. mst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
