On 12/03/2013 01:04 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > >> On 12/03/2013 11:27 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> If booting with full DT support (i.e. DMA too, the last piece of the >>> puzzle), then we don't need to use the compatible_request_channel call >>> back or require some of the historical bumph which probably isn't >>> required by a platform data start-up now either. This will also be >>> ripped out in upcoming commits. >>> >>> Cc: [email protected] >>> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> >>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> >> >> Strictly speaking you do not need the second config, but well considering >> that this will all hopefully be removed soon anyway it should be fine. > > That's true it will, but why don't we need the second config? I won't > want the compat function to be called in the DT case.
It will only be called if it was not possible to request the DMA channel from the DT. - Lars -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
