On 12/3/13, 6:22 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> I figured out what you meant by uprobe_events interface yesterday. If I >> have to go to that interface for even 1 function I would do it for all >> -- from a user perspective it is just simpler to have 1 command to setup >> probes. I would prefer that 1 command be perf-probe. > > Yeah, but in that case, why you don't ask us adding sym->binding == STB_LOCAL > in filter_available_functions? :)
I did in a separate email -- you said because there can be multiple local functions with the same name. But local functions is not the only use case I need. For now I will carry the patch locally. At this point I am 20 patches deep and have probably another 20 to go. What's one more. I'll come back to this when I have more time. Thanks, David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
