On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, dt.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-zevio.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-zevio.c
> +static void zevio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
> +{
> + struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
> + struct irq_chip_regs *regs =
> + &container_of(irqd->chip, struct irq_chip_type, chip)->regs;
> +
> + irq_gc_lock(gc);
Why do you need to lock here? You are reading the ack register and not
modifying it. You are neither storing the value in the gc itself. So
what are you trying to protect?
> + readl(gc->reg_base + regs->ack);
> + irq_gc_unlock(gc);
> +}
> +
> +static void init_base(void __iomem *base)
Shouldnt that be marked __init ?
> +{
> + /* Disable all interrupts */
> + writel(~0, base + IO_DISABLE);
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
