On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 08:41:25PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote: > David Woodhouse writes: > > > Yeah.... I'm increasingly tempted to merge ppc32/ppc64 into one arch > > like mips/parisc/s390. Or would that get vetoed on the basis that we > > don't have all that horrid non-OF platform support in ppc64 yet, and > > we're still kidding ourselves that all those embedded vendors will > > either not notice ppc64 or will use OF? > > I'm going to insist that every new ppc64 platform supplies a device > tree. They don't have to have OF but they do need to have the booter > or wrapper supply a flattened device tree (which is just a few kB of > binary data as far as the booter/wrapper is concerned). It doesn't > have to include all the
*shurg* It really is a great idea, but I think it will just move the ire from (serial infos, IRQ table, ?) being in platforms/fooboard.[ch] to platforms/fooboard.h or platforms/fooboard_bootinfos.h So lets just hope ppc64 keeps getting ignored :) -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
