Hi, On 05/12/2013, at 7:49 PM, Peter Chen <peter.c...@freescale.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:44:13PM +1100, Daniel Tang wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 05/12/2013, at 12:44 AM, Peter Chen <peter.c...@freescale.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> lsi is vendor name, what are zevio and nspire? >>> Usually, the compatible string should be "vendor_name,soc_name-module_name" >>> >> >> Because this port uses documentation from reverse engineering, it's >> difficult to work out what is SoC specific and what is device specific. The >> SoC is Zevio but the driver is written for the TI-Nspire. >> > > Please wrap the line to 80 characters. > > The driver is written for the TI-Nspire, and you port this driver for > SoC Zevio platform? The TI-Nspire runs on the Zevio SoC. > Since you use chipidea ip, we don't care the usb > module name at your platform, we only care the soc name which you are > running, it can detect the SoC platform at runtime. > Yep, that's why the latest patch I sent in renames the device tree binding to "lsi,zevio-usb" since zevio is the name of the SoC that the TI-Nspire uses. > At your dts patch, it still uses nspire-usb. > http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=138614886720024&w=2 I'll send a new one in right now. > > Peter Cheers, Daniel Tang-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
