> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net]
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 9:26 AM
>
> On Friday, December 06, 2013 01:08:45 AM Zheng, Lv wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net]
> > > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 6:37 AM
> > >
> > > On Thursday, December 05, 2013 07:26:37 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > When build kernel with make W=1 we get the following compiler error.
> > > >
> > > > In file included from drivers/sfi/sfi_acpi.c:66:0:
> > > > include/linux/sfi_acpi.h: In function ‘acpi_sfi_table_parse’:
> > > > include/linux/sfi_acpi.h:72:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> > > > ‘acpi_table_parse’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > > if (!acpi_table_parse(signature, handler))
> > > > ^
> > > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > > >
> > > > The patch changes acpi/acpi.h inclusion to linux/acpi.h.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > OK
> > >
> > > Lv, I'm dropping your patch cleaning up the inclusions, please sort that
> > > thing
> > > out entirely for the next cycle.
> >
> > No, I think Andy's patch is wrong.
>
> His patch may be wrong, but the warning in his changelog surely is real. :-)
>
> > This warning is existing before merging my fixes.
> >
> > Either we fix this warning or leave it as is.
> >
> > To fix it, you need to add 1 line in sfi_acpi.h rather than change the line.
> > Let me post a fix for this.
>
> Please do. And I'm putting all ACPI header cleanups on hold until all
> warnings
> of this kind have been fixed by them. Otherwise doing those cleanups makes a
> little sense in my opinion.
OK, not only this warning, there is another warning in sfi_acpi.c.
I doubt whether they are strictly tested before upstreamed...
They are all existing warnings.
You can apply my new patch before the cleanup series.
Thanks
-Lv
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i
