On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:46:02AM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> > Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 22:08:20 -0800 > > > Assigning the function's return value to ret just to ignore it seems > > odd. > > > > Might make sense to change the function type to void. > > That's exactly what his very next patch does, undoubtedly the two > patches should be combined into one. > Yes, I think that would be a good idea.
Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
