This patch proposes to remove the use of the IRQF_DISABLED flag

It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.

Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenac...@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/u14-34f.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/u14-34f.c b/drivers/scsi/u14-34f.c
index 9c216e563568..5a03bb3bcfef 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/u14-34f.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/u14-34f.c
@@ -873,7 +873,7 @@ static int port_detect \
 
    /* Board detected, allocate its IRQ */
    if (request_irq(irq, do_interrupt_handler,
-             IRQF_DISABLED | ((subversion == ESA) ? IRQF_SHARED : 0),
+             (subversion == ESA) ? IRQF_SHARED : 0,
              driver_name, (void *) &sha[j])) {
       printk("%s: unable to allocate IRQ %u, detaching.\n", name, irq);
       goto freelock;
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to